Posts tagged “brokerages”

Financial Statistics (8) – Prediction Intervals

October 7th, 2010

- Eric Bank

Prediction interval

We continue our review of elementary statistical concepts that are commonly used in the financial industry (i.e. by prime brokerages, hedge funds, financial analysts, etc.). Recall from a recent article that the formula for a linear regression is:

Yi = b0 + b1Xi + εi for i = 1, …, n

where:

Yi is the ith value of the dependent variable

b0 is the y-intercept

b1 is the slope coefficient

Xi is the ith value of the independent variable

εi is the ith value of an error term

i is the index of a particular variable

n is the maximum value of i

Unfortunately, we do not have access to the population values of b0 and b1, so we are forced to estimate these values with b0estimated and b1estimated.  This is one cause of uncertainty in the predicted value of Yi. The second cause of uncertainty is the error term εi , which is the difference between the estimated and true value of Yi.  These two uncertainties beg the question: How confident are we about the forecast results? To answer this question, we calculate a prediction interval which is an estimated interval into which future observations will fall, with a given probability, in light of past observations.

For example, if we forecasted that sales for ABC Corporation would grow by 8 percent this year, our prediction would be more meaningful if we were 95 percent confident that sales growth would fall in the interval from 7 percent to 9 percent.  A value outside the 7% to 9% range would not instill confidence in the value.

We can compute confidence intervals using our old friend, the standard error of the estimate s. The variance of the prediction error is equal to the square of the standard error of the estimate, namely sf2.   This estimated variance can be calculated using this formula:

Note that sx2 is the variance of the independent variable X.

After you calculate the variance of the prediction error, you choose a significance level α, say 0.05.  We apply another old friend, the t-statistic, which is the critical value for the forecast interval and can be looked up in the back of any statistics textbook..  By using (1 – α) = 0.95, we can compute the percent prediction interval Y as

Y = ± tc sf

Let’s take a numerical example[i] as follows:

1)     Assume a linear regression equation Y = 1.3478 + 30.0169(0.10) = 4.3495; the standard error of the estimate s = 0.7422; the mean value of X = 0.0647; the variance of the mean sx2 = 0.004641; the number of observations n = 9, the number of coefficients (the y-intercept and the slope) = 2.

2)     Assume we are interested in the 95% confidence interval.

3)     Compute the variance of the prediction error:

sf2 = 0.74222 [1 + 1/9 +  (0.10 – 0.0647)2 /  (9 – 1)0.004641] = 0.630556

4)     Take the square root of the variance of the prediction error sf2, giving the standard deviation of the forecast error sf = (0.630556)1/2 =  0.7941.

5)     The degrees of freedom = (observations n – number of coefficients) = (9 – 2) = 7. From the back of a statistics book, the critical t-statistic for 7 degrees of freedom at the 95% confidence interval, tc = 2.365.

6)     We compute the prediction interval for the 95% level of confidence. It is equal to the following:

Y = ± tc sf = 4.3495 – 2.365(0.7941) to 4.3495 + 2.365(0.7941) = 2.4715 to 6.2275.

From this example, we are 95% confident that a value of the dependent variable will have a value between 2.4715 and 6.2275, the prediction interval.

Well, we have now reviewed the basic concepts pertaining to single-variable linear regressions. We’ll pick up our voyage through financial statistics next time by examining multiple regressions.


[i] DeFusco, McLeavey, Pinto and Runkle, “Quantitative Methods for Investment Analysis, Second Edition”, pages 323-324.

Financial Statistics (1) – Correlation

September 7th, 2010

Scatter plot

Many people who work at financial institutions, such as prime brokerages and hedge funds, have had formal financial training, including the use of statistics and other quantitative methods.  Today we are launching a series of blogs that cover these important topics at a straightforward, accessible level. We’ll assume you have had some exposure to the subject matter (for instance, you are familiar with terms like population and sample) and that you can handle simple algebra.

Statistics play a key role in financial modeling, so we’ll begin by looking at linear correlations and linear regressions.

Data analysis and prediction are the reasons for employing statistical method.  Data can be organized and presented in many ways.  One of the most popular presentations is a scatter plot, in which two series of observations are plotted on an x-y coordinate graph.  For each data pair (that is, two simultaneous observations), the appropriate point is shown on the graph as the intersection of the x and y values.  For instance, if we place money-supply growth on the x-axis and inflation rate on the y-axis, we can plot a series of unconnected points that indicate some kind of relationship between the two data series.

To indicate how closely two data series are related, we use a measure of their linear association, the correlation coefficient (r). The values that r can have range from -1 (perfect negative correlation) through zero (no linear correlation) to +1 (perfect positive correlation).  To calculate the r of a data sample, we must first understand another statistic: sample covariance.

Covariance measures the extent to which two variables (X, Y) change together. It is given by the following equation:

where

n is the number of data pairs

i is a particular value from 1 to n

is the ith X variable,  is the ith Y variable

and are the mean X and Y values, respectively

In English, this states that the sample covariance is the average value of the product of the deviations of observations on two random variables from their sample means. The use of (n – 1) instead of n to calculate the mean is used to ensure that sample covariance is an unbiased estimate of population variance.

To show the relationship between covariance and r, we note that if we take the covariance of X with itself, we have calculated the variance of X. Variance (denoted by the symbol s2) is a measure of how far values deviate from their mean, and is given by the following equation:

This is the variance of X, a measure of X’s dispersion around its mean   Standard deviation (sx) is the positive square root of variance:

Now we have all of the elements in place to calculate the sample correlation coefficient:

Thus, the correlation coefficient, r, is equal to the covariance of the two variables divided by the product of their standard deviations.  Think of it as the covariance normalized for the dispersion of each variable.

It is assumed that for the correlation coefficient the means and covariances of X, Y, and Cov(X,Y) are finite and constant. Note that r refers solely to linear associations between X and Y, that is, no exponents greater than 1.

A value of r equal to, say, 0.9, would indicate a strong linear relationship between X and Y, but not necessarily any causal relationships between the two variables.  A classic example of spurious correlation is one between vocabulary and height.  One may infer that the real relationship has something to do with age.

Forecasters use correlations to analyze trends and changes in trends. For instance, a change in the consumer price index (CPI) is correlated with a change to the inflation rate. So whenever a new CPI figure is released, economists revise their forecasts for inflation, which in turn affect interest rates and bond prices. When dealing with more than two variables, a correlation matrix is used to sort out the various linear relationships among the variables.

Next time out, we’ll tackle linear regressions.

Prime Brokerages Should Give Clients Daily Reports

April 13th, 2010

Investment firms must give hedge fund clients daily reports on how their money is being held and if it has been reinvested, a U.K. regulator said in proposals responding to the collapse of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.

Around 35 U.K. prime brokerages will be able to invest a maximum of 20 percent of client deposits in their group’s bank accounts and will have to give clients daily updates on whether their money has been re-used as collateral for loans, under the proposals published today by the Financial Services Authority.

The agency has been under pressure to clarify existing rules since a judge overseeing a case involving Lehman in London said they were flawed. The regulator has been examining whether investment firms properly separate client money following Lehman’s 2008 bankruptcy. The New York-based bank’s creditors filed more than $830 billion of claims and regulators are trying to unravel how money moved through the group’s global units.

“The elephant in the room here was the criticism of the rules in the court case,” said Darren Fox, a regulatory lawyer at London-based Simmons & Simmons, who advised two prime- brokerage clients in the case. “But this is a step in the right direction, and the FSA has struck a fair balance between prescription and market practice.”

The FSA’s rules on separating client money were “patently inconsistent and flawed in certain significant respects,” the London court ruled in a lawsuit over the administration of Lehman’s European unit in December.

Lessons of the Crisis

“We are keen to learn the lessons of the recent crisis,” Paul Sharma, the FSA’s director of prudential policy said in a statement. “The paper goes far wider than Lehman — it sets out ways to protect clients and consider market stability in the event of a firm’s insolvency.”

The FSA said it will decide on final rules by the third quarter.

Prime brokerages at investment banks and securities firms have clients like hedge funds. They offer services such as securities trade clearing and the safekeeping of assets.

Prime brokerages will still be able to rehypothecate, or re-use client money as loan collateral, client assets under the proposals. They will need to decide on a limit for that reinvestment which would be stated in a client contract, according to the FSA’s paper.

Firms will have to provide the FSA with client-money audits every year and appoint an executive to make sure client deposits are properly segregated.

While many prime brokerages already provide daily reports to hedge funds, it is still difficult to obtain details when client money is held in other banks, Fox said.

The regulator put firms on notice over the need to properly “ring-fence” client money in March 2009. It is investigating two firms after finding they weren’t properly keeping track of their client accounts. They face fines or a ban of some staff members if breaches are found.

Source

Bottom Logo Wall Bottom Logo Reuters Bottom Logo Forbes Bottom Logo Fortune Bottom Logo Cnn Bottom Logo Cnbc Bottom Logo Fox Bottom Logo Comunity