Posts tagged “new york stock exchange”

Carbon Trading Coming to NYSE

September 8th, 2010

The European arm of the New York Stock Exchange is planning to export is carbon-trading business to North America and Asia through a joint venture with APX Inc.  The timing is perhaps not fortuitous, since the carbon-trading market seems to experiencing a fall from grace.

NYSE Euronext will combine its Paris-based BlueNext unit with APX Inc., a U.S.-based provider of trading technology, to broaden market offerings tied to renewable energy and emissions.  The new NYSE Blue joint venture will compete with offerings from IntercontinentalExchange Inc. (ICE) and CME Group Inc. (CME) in an emerging market whose growth has been partly stalled by the halt of efforts to enact cap-and-trade legislation in the U.S.

“We think the marriage of an infrastructure company, APX, with strong links to voluntary carbon and renewable energy markets, is going to give us a competitive advantage going forward,” said Brian Storms, chief executive of APX, who will take over as CEO of NYSE Blue.

Storms said in an interview Tuesday that he saw no chance of any U.S. cap-and-trade legislation this year, but that NYSE Blue could benefit from “evolving” state-level programs centered on renewable energy and region-specific programs like the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative.

China holds opportunity as well, Storms said, citing government plans to introduce cap-and-trade pilot programs in several cities; there, NYSE Blue would vie with ICE’s Climate Exchange, which maintains a joint venture in the country aimed at developing a new emissions trading platform.

Exchange operators have for years sought inroads to emissions trading, seen as potentially growing into one of the largest commodities markets in the world through government mandates.

Under such cap-and-trade programs, carbon-dioxide producers like coal-fired power plants would have their carbon emissions capped at a certain level by government-issued credits for allowances. Those that exceed their limits would have to purchase added carbon credits from producers whose emissions fall below their allowed amount.

Europe has had the programs in place for several years, but U.S. lawmakers have struggled to implement similar measures, creating a fractured landscape of regional cap-and-trade schemes and voluntary programs that have yet to yield much business.

ICE highlighted the potential seen in carbon trading by agreeing in July to pay $603 million for Climate Exchange Plc, adding the world’s largest emissions market operator to its portfolio of energy and commodity markets. CME secured regulatory approval in July to launch its U.S.-based Green Exchange venture as a standalone unit, and is seeking similar status in the U.K.

ICE has since scaled back the Chicago Climate Exchange unit it acquired in July in the continued absence of a U.S. carbon mandate, and BlueNext has delayed past plans to expand into the U.S.

“Given Congress’s inability or unwillingness to create a nationwide cap-and-trade program, at least for the next three to five years, most of the transactions that have the potential to be exchange-based are going to be in Europe,” said William Bumpers, head of climate-change practice for Baker Botts LLP.

Carbon markets backed by CME and ICE are seen benefiting from the products’ ties to other contracts linked to energy and commodities. NYSE Euronext CEO Duncan Niederauer said in a statement that his company would look to build on its constituency of listed companies and traders that carry exposure to environmental factors.

NYSE Euronext is contributing its ownership in BlueNext in return for a majority stake in the enlarged venture. APX shareholders, including Goldman Sachs & Co. (GS), MissionPoint Capital Partners and Onset Ventures, will get a minority interest in return for the APX business.

Francois-Xavier Saint-Macary, who signed on as CEO of BlueNext Sept. 1, will serve as European chief executive, Storms said. A U.S. CEO will be drawn from APX.

Terms of the deal, seen closing by year-end, were not disclosed.

Source

Flash Trading

September 2nd, 2010

Stocks are normally traded on either exchanges or alternative trading systems (ATS). Orders to buy or sell are submitted at either the market (prevailing) price or at some specified limit price.  Once an order is submitted, an automatic matching process occurs – the order is paired to one or more standing orders, or waits for a satisfactory incoming order.  Since exchanges and ATS are linked in a national market system (NMS), orders may be paired with orders from other locations.  These orders are publicly announced on the exchange’s ticker, and thus are a source of supply/demand information to all market participants.

Flash trades are different – for a fee, before an order is sent from a trading venue (an exchange or ATS) to the NMS, it is briefly revealed (flashed) about 30 milliseconds in advance.  Why?  So that a trader at the local venue can have first shot at matching the best bid or ask. In this way, the local trader can capture the order before it is submitted to the NMS. This results in a flash trade. This practice, while once popular at the New York Stock Exchange, has recently been discontinued there – NYSE market specialists (specially-designated dealers) no longer benefit from an advanced peek at orders.  Instead, all NYSE participants get equal access to incoming trade order information. It explained that they forbade the practice because it wanted to level the playing field for all traders at the exchange.

However, flash trades play an important role at some other venues, especially ATS that compete with exchanges for order flow.  They utilize flash trades to draw volume away from the larger exchanges, and through trading fees realize increased revenue.

Flash trading raises public policy issues, since it gives special privileges – earlier access to order flow information – to a narrow market segment at the expense of the overall market. This sort of favoritism at its face seems to run counter to public policy and market efficiency. Market makers are less likely to post quotes without securing a trading priority, which tends to depress liquidity and the orderly operation of the market.  Another controversial aspect is that flash trading only benefits computer-driven trades, such as high-frequency trading systems, because the sneak-preview afforded by flash trading can only be exploited by a high-speed computer. Some observers predict a future where the financial markets consist solely of computers trading with other computers, while humans sit on the sidelines and cheerlead. One wonders what the source of job satisfaction will be under this scenario.

Flash trading reminds some people of the earlier, illegal practice of front-running – brokers trading for their own accounts with knowledge of their customers’ pending orders. For instance, if a broker noticed buying pressure reflected in his customers’ pending bids, he could buy shares before prices rose, and then sell out at the higher price once he placed his customer’s orders. A legal variant is called tailgating, in which a broker first places customer orders, and then trades the same stocks for his own account.

Currently, many venues have voluntarily suspended flash trading due to unfavorable comments from regulators and market participants, but without specific rules outlawing the practice, flash trading may return at any time, and may spread globally to less-regulated markets.

Bottom Logo Wall Bottom Logo Reuters Bottom Logo Forbes Bottom Logo Fortune Bottom Logo Cnn Bottom Logo Cnbc Bottom Logo Fox Bottom Logo Comunity