Posts tagged “prime broker”

Bermuda Makes Changes to Investment Funds Act

January 4th, 2011

Bermuda has amended its 2006 Investment Funds Act, making new provisions for the regulation of investment funds on the island.

The changes found in the Investment Funds Amendment Act 2010 are designed to “strike a balance between securing appropriate protection for investors in Bermuda funds, while not imposing an undue regulatory burden on the industry.”

The key changes include extending the definition  of “service provider” to include auditors appointed to a fund. As a result, auditors are now required to comply with the “fit and proper” tests set out elsewhere in the Act.

Operators of exempted funds and their service providers are required to be “fit and proper persons to act as such.” Funds are now required to have a recognized fund administrator, an auditor and a Bermuda resident officer or trustee or resident representative who has access to the books and records of the investment fund. Exempted funds are also required to appoint an investment manager, registrar, custodian and/or prime broker.

Under the amended act, fund administrators must notify the Bermuda Monetary Authority in advance when there is a prospective change of control and the Authority now has power to object to a change in control to prevent it happening or to object to existing controllers where they are no longer deemed to be fit and proper to be controllers.

The amended also provides for a right of appeal in cases where the Authority has exercised this power to object.

Fund administration businesses in Bermuda must also meet the “four-eyes” criterion, that is, they must be directed by at least two people to ensure no one person exercises “excessive” control.

Finally, fund officers must be “fit and proper” at the time of authorization to ensure that the business of the fund is being conducted in a prudent manner.

Source

Former SocGen Trader Now Officially a Thief – Convicted of Stealing Software

November 23rd, 2010

Samarth Agrawal, convicted thief

The proprietary trading software developed by a trading firm is considered the crown jewel of the operation. Woe to any disgruntled employee who tries to steal it. And woe was exactly what was visited on former Société Générale trader Samarth Agrawal, accused of stealing the bank’s high-frequency trading software for use at his new hedge fund job. The jury convicted him yesterday in a quick decision.

Agrawal was also convicted of transporting stolen property across state lines. The jury verdict was expected, given that Agrawal admitted on the stand Wednesday “all the essential elements” of the theft of trade secrets charge, U.S. District Judge Jed Rakoff said.

For most of the two-week trial, Agrawal denied any wrongdoing. Indeed, during the first part of his testimony, he said that he had taken SocGen’s code home on orders from his superiors. But he later admitted that he “did it because I have to build the similar system at Tower” Research Group, a hedge fund that had hired him.

Tower has denied that it hired Agrawal to get access to the prime broker’s high-frequency trading software.

Agrawal will be sentenced on Feb. 24. Rakoff said on Wednesday that he suspected the late admission was part of a “sympathy defense.” It appears to have worked; on Friday, Rakoff said Agrawal “may be entitled” to a lesser sentence due to his “acceptance of responsibility.” He faces between three years and 10 months and four years and nine months under federal sentencing guidelines; the Indian citizen will likely be deported from the U.S. after completing his sentence.

SocGen said it was “satisfied” with the verdict.

Source

Hedge Fund Hotel Heartbreak: UBS Settles for $100K

November 22nd, 2010

The “Hedge Fund Hotel” wasn’t a four-star luxury palace where fund managers went to be pampered and spoiled, though we are sure such places do exist. Rather, it’s the term used for an arrangement conferring office space, technology and other services to hedge funds by a certain prime broker.  Now, Massachusetts has fined UBS Securities LLC $100,000 to settle a complaint the prime broker didn’t fully disclose its arrangements with hedge fund advisers.

UBS Securities, a unit of UBS AG. settled the allegations without admitting or denying wrongdoing, a spokesman for Massachusetts Secretary of the Commonwealth William F. Galvin said Thursday. UBS spokeswoman Allison Chin-Leong said, “we’re pleased to have resolved the matter.”

The case dates back to a 2002 inquiry into ABN Amro Securities LLC, a prime broker that offered an arrangement known as a “hedge-fund hotel.” UBS acquired ABN Amro’s prime brokerage business in 2003 for $250 million. Massachusetts’ Galvin said UBS didn’t enforce a requirement that its hedge-fund hotel clients disclose their arrangements with the bank to investors.

Prime brokers profit off spreads they charge hedge funds to finance trades as well as fees for clearing and other services. In a hedge-fund hotel, a prime broker provides start-up hedge funds equipment and other services to help incubate their business. But the arrangement can create conflicts unknown to the endowments, pensions, or other investors in the funds.

In a 2007 administrative complaint against UBS, Massachusetts’ Galvin accused the firm’s prime brokerage division of maintaining a quid pro quo with hedge-fund advisers, requiring them to meet benchmarks of profitability for UBS or ensure they don’t use other prime brokers.

In one instance, the 2007 complaint alleged, a hedge-fund adviser who refused to alter his trading strategy to meet UBS’ demand for greater revenue was no longer welcomed in UBS’ office space.

Galvin didn’t allege any investors were damaged by the practice.

The hedge-fund advisers are supposed to disclose their arrangements with prime brokers to investors, but Galvin contends UBS failed to enforce these disclosures even though it had a policy to do so. In settling the allegations, UBS agreed to retain an independent consultant to review its disclosure policy and monitor it for three years.

Source

The Russians Are Coming

September 30th, 2010

A major Russian prime brokerage is expanding its UK client base at a rapid rate, giving impetus to the view that emerging markets like Russia will continue to see unabated growth.  The brokerage, Otkritie Securities, owned by one of Russia’s largest banking companies, announced plans this week to double the number of hedge fund clients before the year ends.

Roman Lohov, chief of global markets and investment banking at Otkritie Bank and CEO of Otkritie Securities, acknowledged his firm has a queue of potential customers that will see the bank’s UK clientele increase from around 40 to 100 by 2011. Hedge fund assets in the company’s custody operation are also anticipated to double to $2bn within the same time period.

“We are building serious traction in Europe and expect to make rapid progress in the coming months,” Lokhov declared. “Our aim is to be the leading prime broker for emerging market hedge funds in the world.”

Otkritie is based in Moscow and London, and began its prime brokerage business only 12 months ago. It now has a complete prime brokerage operation in the UK, US, Russia and Scandinavia, and also provides execution services in several of the world’s emerging territories, including Turkey, Brazil, and the CIS. An execution service in India is slated to go live this October.

The firm has seized on recent opportunities, such as acquiring three of Russia’s crisis-plagued banks in a merger scheduled for October. It is continuing its ongoing aggressive hiring campaign and recently added a team of researchers from Credit Suisse Russia.

The emerging market’s growth has been boosted by excellent performance in Russia and Latin America.  Fund managers have taken note and are planning to capitalize on the industry growth. Only last week, Brevan Howard, one of Europe’s largest hedge funds, made public plans to initiate a new office in São Paulo, Brazil.

Source

Traders at JPMorgan Doing the Sideways Shuffle

September 29th, 2010

JPMorgan Chase has created a new unit for alternative investments that will be a part of its asset management division. Proprietary traders for the investment bank are being transferred to the new unit.

This move is part of the continued fallout from this year’s financial reform legislation. Investments banks are expediting the demise of their proprietary trading operations, which will soon be forbidden under the newly-enacted bank regulations in the U.S. In contrast to prime broker Goldman Sachs’ decision to shut down its proprietary desks, JPMorgan will relocate its traders for equity, emerging markets and structured credit to the new alternatives unit. The traders will no longer manage money for the bank itself – they will focus exclusively on outside clients.

Dealbraker .com reports the following quote from an internal memo from Mary Erdoes, CEO of JPMorgan Asset Management: “Colleagues who will transition have delivered strong risk-adjusted returns for the firm, and we are confident that clients will benefit from their investment experience and insight,”

Erdoes will supervise the proprietary traders moving to the new unit. The transition, headed by co-head of global emerging markets Mike Stewart, will take a number of years, Erdoes and Jes Staley, CEO of JPMorgan’s investment banking unit, said.

Stewart, who will lead the new unit, is also working with Larry Unrein, who heads JPMorgan Asset Management’s hedge fund and private equity operations, to establish it. Stewart will remain in his current post through the end of the year.

Source

FSA Levies Fines Against U.K. Law Firm Over Lehman-Backed Products

September 23rd, 2010

A U.K. lawyer

The United Kingdom’s Financial Services Authority has issued a fine against law firm Thorntons Law LLP for misleading clients during the marketing of structured products that had the backing of now-defunct prime broker Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.  The fines against the Scotland- based firm and two individuals were levied because they did not warn customers about the riskiness of the products.

Thorntons received a fine of 35,000 pounds ($55,000) and Michael Royden, a partner at the firm, 10,500 pounds, the regulator said in a statement today on its website. The FSA also fined Robert Peter Yarr, a financial adviser at McClelland Yarr Financial Services Ltd. in Belfast, 28,000 pounds.

The FSA said in October that three firms were facing fines after it probed sales literature in the 107 million-pound structured-products market. Lehman’s September 2008 collapse and bankruptcy prompted lawsuits by former clients whose assets were frozen in insolvency proceedings around the world.

“Firms and individuals giving investment advice must properly assess their clients’ needs and make suitable recommendations,” FSA head of enforcement Margaret Cole said in the statement. “They must also have the necessary systems and controls in place to ensure that this happens.”

Royden was in charge of compliance at Thorntons’ Investment Services at the time the firm was offering the products from November 2007 and August 2008. Structured products were typically marketed as guaranteeing the principal amount of money invested, even if no returns were possible. After Lehman’s collapse, the investors’ original contributions weren’t repaid.

Thorntons “commissioned an independent review of systems, following which, a number of improvements have been implemented,” the firm said in an e-mailed statement. “We are in the process of reviewing each case to ensure that our obligations regarding redress are met and a number of clients affected by the FSA findings have already received payment.”

Royden and Yarr didn’t immediately respond to requests for comment. All three received the FSA’s standard 30 percent discount for cooperating with the probe.

In February, the regulator fined a unit of RSM Tenon Group Plc, a London-based financial-advice company, 700,000 pounds for failing to explain to customers the risks of products backed by Lehman.

Source

Scandal-Plagued Goldman Sachs Gets Hit Again

September 10th, 2010

No matter how hard it tries, Goldman Sachs in not being allowed to forget how it and trader Fabrice Tourre defrauded customers.  In the latest round of infamy, the huge investment bank/prime broker was fined £17.5m for forgetting to inform the UK’s Financial Services Authority that it was under investigation by US authorities.

The FSA said on Thursday that Goldman’s US arm failed to share critical information with the bank’s compliance department in London about a US investigation of subprime mortgage products for more than 18 months.

That omission meant Goldman failed to notify the FSA that it and trader Fabrice Tourre had been warned in September 2009 by the US Securities and Exchange Commission that they were likely to face civil fraud charges. At the time, Mr Tourre was working in London in a function that required FSA approval.

Fabrice Tourre

The SEC filed charges in April 2010 and settled with Goldman for $550m in July. Mr. Tourre is still fighting allegations that he misled investors in a complex mortgage-backed security known as Abacus.

The FSA said that Goldman officials could have considered notifying them about the probe as early as February 2009 and “at the latest” when the bank received the so-called Wells notice from the SEC warning of potential charges.

Margaret Cole, the FSA’s managing director of enforcement and financial crime, preached: “We have repeatedly stressed the importance of firms self-reporting regulatory issues to the FSA in a timely way. GSI [Goldman’s London arm] did not set out to hide anything, but its defective systems and controls meant that the level and quality of its communications with the FSA fell far below what we expect of an authorized firm.

“This penalty should send a message – particularly to the senior management of large institutions – of the need to have their firm’s UK reporting obligations at the forefront of their minds,” she pontificated.

Fiona Laffan, Goldman spokeswoman, squirmed: “We are pleased the matter is resolved.” Goldman received a discount for settling the case at an early stage. Without it, the fine would have been £25m.

Mr Tourre’s attorney clammed up when he received a request for comment.

The fine is the second-largest in FSA history. JPMorgan set the record in June when it paid £33.3m for failing to keep client money in separate accounts.

The FSA opened its investigation into Goldman in April after the SEC filed its charges. The SEC claimed Goldman had failed to disclose that a hedge fund that was betting against the security had selected some of the mortgage loans included in the portfolio, costing investors as much as $1billion.

Goldman, the world’s best-known investment bank, has seen its reputation tarnished in recent months as questions continue to swirl over whether it favored the interests of some clients at the expense of others during the financial crisis.

The bank’s business model is also under pressure amid volatile markets and regulatory reforms that have forced it to shut some of its highly profitable “proprietary” trading operations.

On Wednesday it emerged that KKR, the private equity firm, is in early talks with individuals in Goldman Sachs’ proprietary trading group that could lead to the hiring of a number of Goldman’s key people.

Source

Numis Securities Sued by Fidelity Over Alleged Fraud

September 1st, 2010

Prime broker and investment bank Numis Securities stands accused of ‘fraudulent misrepresentations’ with regard to a 2007 fund raising.  Its accusers, Fidelity Investments and the London-based hedge fund CQS, made the claim in a lawsuit filed yesterday.

The stock in question, the now insolvent Canadian oil company Rock Well Petroleum, used Numis to raise in $150 million (£97 million) from investors. Fidelity and CQS, alongside Oceanic and St Peter Port Capital, are said to have invested a combined $95 million in Rock Well.

However, according to Fidelity and CQS, Numis failed to mention in its investor briefing at the time that US-based oil rival, Omega Oil, had launched a legal action against Rock Well, claiming the group had infringed its patents.

In a statement posted on the London stock exchange at midday Numis confirmed it had been notified about the allegations but claimed they were unfounded.

The broker said: ‘Numis notes the press coverage in relation to a legal claim and confirms that it has been notified of allegations, via this claim, in relation to a private placing in 2007 in respect of Rock Well Petroleum Inc.  Numis believes that the allegations are entirely spurious and unfounded.  Numis will defend this claim vigorously, following due process.’

The statement helped restore some sentiment in the stock. At 1.10pm shares in the firm were 3p, or 2.05%, lower at 144p having slumped by as much as 10% earlier in the session.

CQS and Fidelity would not respond to Numis’s statement.

CQS is a global diversified asset management group with a focus on convertibles, asset backed securities and credit portfolios.  It manages hedge funds, loan products and long-only funds with regulated investment operations in London, New York and Hong Kong.

Rock Well Petroleum (U.S.), Inc. operated as an oil development and production company. The company was incorporated in 2005 and was based in Sheridan, Wyoming. Rock Well Petroleum (U.S.), Inc. operated as a subsidiary of RockWell Petroleum Inc. On December 16, 2008, Rock Well Petroleum (U.S.), Inc. filed for Chapter 15 protection with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in the District of Wyoming.

Source

Mellon Pitted Against Cuomo In Response to New York Lawsuit

August 26th, 2010

NY AG Andrew Cuomo

In response to a lawsuit filed by the New York Attorney General, the Bank of New York Mellon insisted Monday that it was not involved in withholding information from clients regarding the Bernard Madoff Ponzi scheme.

The bank/prime broker’s Ivy Asset Management and two of its executives refuted charges that they misinformed clients about investments tied to convicted Ponzi scheme operator Bernard Madoff and asked a judge to dismiss the claims made by New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo.

Ivy, BNY Mellon’s New York-based investment adviser, withheld damaging information about Mr. Madoff so the firm could make millions of dollars in fees, Mr. Cuomo said when he sued Ivy in May. He also sued former Ivy CEO Lawrence Simon and ex-Chief Investment Officer Howard Wohl. The complaint was filed in New York State Supreme Court.

In their answers filed Monday, Messrs. Simon and Wohl as well as Ivy asked for a judgment in their favor, dismissal of all claims and payment of legal fees.

The three parties said they “had no duty to disclose the information that the complaint alleges was not disclosed,” the defendants wrote. They also claim they “acted at all times in good faith and without any fraudulent intent.”

From 1998 to 2008, Ivy was paid more than $40 million to give advice and conduct due diligence for clients with large Madoff investments, Mr. Cuomo claims. He said internal e-mails revealed that even after the company learned Mr. Madoff wasn’t investing client funds as promised, Ivy kept silent to keep from losing the fees. Ivy’s clients lost more than $227 million, Mr. Cuomo said.

In the original complaint, Cuomo cited a 1998 document in which ex-CEO Larry Simon rejected Wohl’s recommendation that, because of what Ivy knew about Madoff, the investment adviser should pull its own funds from the scammer because such a move could jeopardize the Madoff fees:

“Amount we now have with Bernie in Ivy’s partnerships is probably less than $5 million. The bigger issue is the 190 mil or so that our relationships have with him which leads to two problems, we are on the legal hook in almost all of the relationships and the fees generated are estimated based on 17+% returns…[to be] $1.275 Million…. Are we prepared to take all the chips off the table, have assets decrease by over $300 million and our overall fees reduced by $1.6 million or more, and, one wonders if we ever “escape” the legal issue of being the asset allocator and introducer, even if we terminate all Madoff related relationships?”

Mr. Simon has released a series of emails that he insists vindicates his position.

Source

A Few Real Estate Agents Benefit from Lehman Brothers Collapse

August 25th, 2010

Time Warner Center

James Nicholson thought he had it all. He managed a popular hedge fund, and had property in New York City, Southampton, Florida and New Jersey. Were it not for the collapse of Lehman Brothers, he still might be lighting his cigars with hundred dollar bills. But the prime broker’s collapse exposed Nicholson’s hedge fund for what it really was: a Ponzi scheme.

Accordingly, the U.S. Marshals service has sold off hedge fund fraudster James Nicholson’s Manhattan pied a terre, for $1.75 million less than he paid for it. The condominium in New York’s Time Warner Center, on Columbus Circle, sold for $6.75 million. Nicholson paid $8.5 million for the apartment in May 2008, just months before his $133 million Ponzi scheme collapsed.

The Time Warner Center sale follows the sale of Nicholson’s Palm Beach, Fla., penthouse and Southampton, N.Y., estate. Nicholson’s Saddle River, N.J., home is under contract, while the fate of the $337,500 Montvale, N.J., condo he bought for his mother-in-law remains uncertain.

Proceeds from the real-estate sales will be returned to Nicholson’s victims, who lost between $7 million and $140 million during his five-year fraud.

Nicholson pleaded guilty to the fraud in December, admitting that he began lying to investors in his Westgate Capital Management hedge fund as far back as 2004. But the meat of the scam didn’t come until the collapse of Lehman Brothers, which in turn precipitated the collapse of Nicholson’s seven hedge funds. In the wake of his losses on the Lehman bankruptcy, Nicholson lied to investors about his returns and how much the funds were managing: He claimed to run $900 million; he actually ran no more than $60 million.

Nicholson’s scam fell apart in December 2008, when $5 million in redemption checks bounced.

He faces up to 45 years in prison when he is sentenced in October.

Source

Bottom Logo Wall Bottom Logo Reuters Bottom Logo Forbes Bottom Logo Fortune Bottom Logo Cnn Bottom Logo Cnbc Bottom Logo Fox Bottom Logo Comunity